While The Research Loop is primarily designed for patients and caregivers who have read research they found on their own to provide feedback on the articles they read, we want to start trying to share articles that may be ripe for feedback.  Any articles we share will be open access or accessible via a free registration.

We’re sending out our first feedback request by asking patients and caregivers to submit feedback on an article in JAMA Oncology entitled Patient Demands and Requests for Cancer Tests and Treatments (abstract below).

Make sure you are registered with The Research Loop.  Then go read the article and make notes.  Once you’ve read it, come back and submit your feedback.

We can’t wait to hear your thoughts!

Abstract:

Patient Demands and Requests for Cancer Tests and Treatments

Keerthi Gogineni, MD, MSHP
Katherine L. Shuman, MSN, RNDerek Chinn, BS; et al.
JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):33-39. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.197

Importance  Surveyed physicians tend to place responsibility for high medical costs more on “demanding patients” than themselves. However, there are few data about the frequency of demanding patients, clinical appropriateness of their demands, and clinicians’ compliance with them.

Objective  To assess how frequently patients demand or request medical tests or treatments, what types they demand, the clinical appropriateness of their demands, and how frequently clinicians comply.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Immediately after visits, clinicians—physicians, fellows, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants—were interviewed about whether the patient made a demand or request and their type and appropriateness. Interviews occurred in oncology outpatient facilities at 3 Philadelphia-area hospitals between October 2013 and June 2014.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The 4 main outcomes were (1) frequency of patient demands for medical tests or treatments, (2) the types of tests or treatments demanded, (3) clinicians’ assessment of the clinical appropriateness of the demands, and (4) how frequently clinicians complied.

Results  There were 5050 patient-clinician encounters involving 3624 patients and 60 clinicians. Overall, of the 5050 encounters, 440 (8.7%) included a patient demand or request for a medical intervention. Clinicians complied with 365 of the clinically appropriate demands (83.0%). In only 50 of the 440 encounters with demands (11.4%) did the patient demand or request clinically inappropriate interventions. Clinicians complied with 7 of these inappropriate demands or requests (14%). Clinicians complied with inappropriate demands or requests in only 0.14% (7 of 5050) of encounters. Of the 440 patient demands, 216 (49.1%) were for imaging studies; 68 (15.5%) were for palliative treatments, excluding chemotherapy or radiation; and 60 (13.6%) were for laboratory tests. In a multivariable model, having lung/head and neck cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41), receiving active treatments (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11-1.77), and a fair- or poor-quality patient-clinician relationship (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.13-7.07) were associated with patients making demands or requests (all P < .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Patient demands occur in 8.7% of patient-clinician encounters in the outpatient oncology setting. Clinicians deem most demands or requests as clinically appropriate. Clinically inappropriate demands occur in 1% of encounters, and clinicians comply with very few. At least in oncology, “demanding patients” seem infrequent and may not account for a significant proportion of costs.


While you’re here: